Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol

(fontgenerator.design)

139 points | by yarlinghe 5 days ago

33 comments

  • slashdave 0 minutes ago
    Huh. Why can't it find "Angstrom" (U+212B)?
  • Fileformat 6 hours ago
    I run a couple similar sites:

    FileFormat.Info[1] has a page per codepoint. It has been around awhile, so the UI isn't as whizzy, but it has all the data and works w/o JavaScript

    UnicodeSearch[2] is an updated search UI that uses JavaScript and the excellent Tabulator grid widget.

    There are actually a ton of similar sites with a page-per-codepoint. It is all fun to make one, until the bots come along and hammer every page.

    [1] https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2248/index.htm

    [2] https://www.unicodesearch.org/

    • darrenf 5 hours ago
      Long time fileformat.info user. here, just wanted to say thanks -- always found it incredibly useful for this exact purpose.
    • catoc 1 hour ago
      1. Enthusiastically try fileformat.info

      2. “141 TCF vendor(s) and 69 ad partner(s) want to track you”

      3. Exit :-(

  • merelysounds 2 hours ago
    Feature request: some context, history and/or example of popular usage.

    Some symbols leave me with more questions than answers, like “LEFT HALF RUNNING MAN”[1].

    I’d like to at least see that it’s a glyph part, that there are two in total, and what does the other half look like; right now the “right half running man” is not listed anywhere on that page, not even in the “related symbols” section.

    Off topic, the running man symbol possibly comes from MouseText character set (the one in the Apple IIc[2]). It was one of many character sets included in the legacy computing block[3].

    [1]: https://fontgenerator.design/symbol/left-half-running-man

    [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MouseText

    [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbols_for_Legacy_Computing

  • rsync 27 minutes ago
    Clean ?

    - Gratuitous, unnecessary cookies (and accompanying cookie consent dialog)

    - cloudflare insights built into the pages

    - non-zero counter in ublock origin

    That's before we even get to the page source which contains, among other things:

      "text\":\"First, ensure you're using a modern browser. If problems persist, try refreshing the page or clearing your browser cache. Some older devices may have limited font support.\"}}
    
    "Clean" web pages don't need hints like this - they work without clearing browser cache or worrying about "older devices".

    I haven't seen this on HN in a while so it is worth reposting:

    https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

  • WA 8 hours ago
    Nice, but way too many abbreviated descriptions and no way to see the full name of a symbol without clicking on it. Needs a tooltip / title.

    Or better, if 90% of all symbol names are abbreviated, your design simply doesn't work. This is especially apparent in the "arrows" section.

    • yarlinghe 7 hours ago
      You’re right.

      The abbreviations (arrows in particular) made scanning worse than it should be. I’ve pushed a quick update: full names on hover/focus, plus a Compact / Readable toggle for the grid.

      Thanks for the nudge.

  • wdporter 7 hours ago
    I find this page the cleanest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unicode_characters. I can usually just do a Ctrl-F and find what I want.
  • jdeisenberg 10 hours ago
    I’m looking at the currency block. Each box has a colored “drop shadow”. I spent a minute or so trying to figure out what the significance of the color is. Finally, I noticed that the color appears to cycle between cyan, magenta, and yellow. Is this a design element only, or do the colors actually have some meaning with respect to the symbol?
    • yarlinghe 9 hours ago
      Purely cosmetic. In hindsight, probably unnecessary — but once you add color, it’s hard to stop
      • troupo 8 hours ago
        I was going to complain about something or other in the design but then stopped myself: we don't get enough quirky designs as it is.
    • spoiler 10 hours ago
      Not the author, but it seems to be only stylistic
  • diziet 3 hours ago
    Cool! Ideas: At least do an ensemble approach by queuering llms to explain what the symbols "are". It's so auto generated now. Link to wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximation#Typography

    Developers need to understand context too, not see a static page of "macOS: Use Character Viewer (Control + Command + Space) and search by name, or copy/paste."

    The related to symbols make little sense. For example: https://fontgenerator.design/symbol/acute-angle Does not link to all other "angle" pages, but does to Aktieselskab?

  • thwarted 3 hours ago
    It's odd that searching for "section" finds U+2E39 (Top Half Section Sign) but not U+00A7 (Section Sign).

    The directions for input on on each operating system are all the same, use an app? On Windows there's a key sequence based on the codepoint integer. It should tell you exactly what to type. The Linux one is especially odd "Use the Character Map app or a Compose key sequence, then paste into your app" because if there's a compose key sequence you don't need to paste it.

  • yarlinghe 5 days ago
    Planning to add more symbol-specific notes (confusables, common pitfalls, rendering quirks). Curious what details people usually look for but can’t find.
    • layer8 2 hours ago
      The useful info that doesn’t already exist a dozen times on the web is the info you can’t auto-generate.
    • __patchbit__ 5 days ago
      I don't know how to find the ideal font for the missing glyph on my environment which is BSD.

      Using the `unicode' command from plan9userspace, for example

         unicode 2ff0-2fff
      
      the last three symbols are shown inside emacs as squares with the four hex values inside.

      Typing in the search field `2fff' finds `no match found'.

      • yarlinghe 4 days ago
        Good catch — I just pushed an update based on this.

        The symbols search now supports code-point lookup, so you can search by:

        U+2FFF

        0x2FFF

        plain hex (2fff, 4–6 digits)

        This makes it possible to jump straight to a symbol page even when the glyph doesn’t render locally and you only have the code point (like the Emacs/BSD case you described).

        One limitation to note: some symbols aren’t covered by common or default system fonts, so they may still appear as tofu boxes depending on the font stack. That’s a font coverage issue rather than Unicode itself.

        Appreciate you calling this out — this was exactly the kind of workflow gap I wanted to catch.

        • longor1996 9 hours ago
          Maybe you could use unifont glyphs (drawn as SVGs?) as fallback?
  • amelius 4 hours ago
    Could use a list of (free) fonts that support the corresponding glyph.
    • layer8 2 hours ago
      Also coverage by system fonts.
  • arendtio 9 hours ago
    Some constructive criticism:

    Please don't display text directly on the grid background image. It makes it impossible to read the text easily. Currently, this is the case when you open the page for a specific symbol in the 'Usage & Context' section.

  • layer8 2 hours ago
    The styling/design doesn’t work with dark-mode extensions like Noir.
  • keepamovin 9 hours ago
    This is beautiful. Love the design. When I read the title I thought it was "one page per Unicode" so I click on the codes and hope a page will open with a giant Unicode where I can see about it in details.

    Oh well! Still good.

    When I click the "Click to copy" my UI reflex tells me to look for a "Copied!" or similar acknowledgement. But I don't see one, so there's uncertainty if it was copied safely to my invisible clipboard or not.

    Please keep making this, it's good! What inspired you for the design? I like this style, and notice it around, but can't pinpoint.

    • phforms 8 hours ago
      Don’t know if it was added after your comment, but there actually is one separate page for each character, just click the arrow in the top-right corner of each box. For more "giant" character previews I can recommend https://decodeunicode.org/en (which is more focussed on writing systems though).

      There is also a "Copied x" toast (is this the correct term? idk) at the bottom of the viewport when you click a character box, maybe it was also added later on.

      • kmoser 56 minutes ago
        > There is also a "Copied x" toast (is this the correct term? idk) at the bottom of the viewport

        It's obscured by the "We use optional cookies..." popup.

      • keepamovin 6 hours ago
        Or maybe I just wasn't looking at the bottom! Thanks
  • ChrisMarshallNY 9 hours ago
    Very nice.

    I found it odd, that tapping on a square “highlights” it, by making it “pop,” but nothing else really happens.

    It took me a bit to figure out that I need to actually select the arrow in the upper right corner, to get the page.

    • tantalor 5 hours ago
      The arrow is too small to click on mobile
  • brisket_bronson 2 hours ago
    Quite useful, but that's far from "clean".
  • NooneAtAll3 4 hours ago
    How do I search for egyptian hieroglyphs? searching for "egyptian" neither for "hieroglyph" works

    searching directly for 𓁤 also doesn't work

    • NooneAtAll3 4 hours ago
      expanded button go over the side of the screen for me

      pressing "V", which I'd assume meant "expand horizontal button queue into a vertical text list" instead collapses all descriptions and turns "v" into a hamburger button...

  • typeofhuman 8 hours ago
    No disrespect but I would not call this "clean". The design is overwhelmingly cluttered and distracting. Especially given that each symbol is obscured by a black square with an arrow covering it. The symbols are themselves very small.

    Maybe get rid of all the noise and just display the symbols in a nice grid without all the fluff or layers.

    • lejalv 6 hours ago
      It feels really noisy and specifically, not clean for me too, so much that it pushes me away. It's interesting and fortunate that it works for the author and some (most?) commentators.
    • hnlmorg 7 hours ago
      I agree. Unicode references sites are numerous and yet this is one of the worst I’ve used in terms of distracting visual noise.
  • california-og 6 hours ago
    My go-to site for Unicode symbols is graphemica.com. I like that you show very directly the different use cases, but miss different encodings and the ability to browse unicode sequentially.
    • jeffhwang 5 hours ago
      +1 graphemica has the right mix of completeness and simplicity for my tastes.
  • victrflow 9 hours ago
    Ohh, this is great! I actually was looking for something like this the other day. Thanks for sharing and nice work!
  • LordGrey 5 days ago
    I really like this. I appreciate the many "copy" buttons that make it easy to grab various font values once I find a character. Good job!
    • yarlinghe 4 days ago
      Thanks — glad the copy buttons are useful. That was exactly the goal.
  • mda 9 hours ago
    On mobile, the expand icon covers 1/4 of each character so it is hard to see what they are
    • StrangeSound 8 hours ago
      Opposite problem for me. I'm finding it impossible to expand because the button is so small!
    • yarlinghe 9 hours ago
      Yeah, mobile is rougher than desktop right now. Thanks for flagging it.
  • chrismorgan 8 hours ago
    > Use an HTML entity, a decimal code, or a hex code.

    Please no: just write the character. <, & and (in quoted attributes) " or ' are the only characters that need to be encoded; a few others have arguable benefit to being encoded (most notably NO-BREAK SPACE), but most Unicode characters should just be put in literally. The days when you couldn’t be confident of the file encoding are past: your HTML is being served as UTF-8 (or in the rare case it isn’t, you should fix that instead of avoiding non-ASCII in the source).

    Same deal with CSS (" and \ are the only ones you need to escape) and JavaScript (" or ' or `, as appropriate).

    URLs? Occasionally you may encounter a legacy system where you need to percent-encode it yourself (similarly around punycoding internationalised domain names), but you can almost always (and thus, in my opinion, should) just write it and leave anything that wants it to be ASCII to perform the percent-encoding itself.

    Excel I can’t comment on, but I presume you can just write "≈" and UNICHAR should almost never be used.

    • yarlinghe 7 hours ago
      Yep — fully agree.

      For modern HTML/CSS/JS, you should just write the character and serve UTF-8. The entities / codes are there purely as reference for legacy cases, debugging, or when you only have a code point and no rendered glyph — not as a recommendation for normal authoring.

  • MassPikeMike 2 hours ago
    See also the very comprehensive presentation at https://codepoints.net . For example https://codepoints.net/U+2248?lang=en
  • rswail 9 hours ago
    I'd like the hint to display the hidden parts of each box when hovered.

    I don't need to be told on each one to "Click to Copy".

    But nice concept.

    • yarlinghe 9 hours ago
      Good points. The hover hint could definitely do more useful work, and the repeated “Click to Copy” is probably overexplaining. UI polish still very much in progress
  • toss1 3 hours ago
    Very cool and helpful - I'll be using this a lot!

    Interesting I discovered two new-to-me temperature symbols (℃ and ℉), but couldn't find the Alt-0176 ° generic degree sign that shows up on the MS Character Map app. I also found the There Exists symbol ∃ !! I'd been seeking for years; it was so useful since finding out about it in college logic courses... This will be even more useful when the Alt-code fields are all filled in! Thanks!

  • Freak_NL 10 hours ago
    > We use cookies and similar technologies for analytics (Google Analytics) and session recording (Microsoft Clarity). Ads may be enabled in the future (Google AdSense). By continuing to use this site, you acknowledge this notice. You can manage cookies in your browser settings. EU/UK users: this serves as our cookie notice.

    No. Please just give me an option to reject all tracking cookies instead of just kicking me in the face with a done deal.

    Whoever wrote this 'EU/UK users: this serves as our cookie notice' is ignorant of the actual law. Have a look at:

    https://gdpr.eu/cookies/

    • yarlinghe 9 hours ago
      Fair point — you’re right to call this out. I’ve now removed Microsoft Clarity (no session recording/heatmaps), and GA4 is opt‑in with a real “Reject all” option (default off). This is already deployed.
  • whalesalad 5 hours ago
    Gotta pay homage to the OG: https://raquo.net/rsaquo/
  • alexpadula 8 hours ago
    Useful!