7 comments

  • stmw 28 days ago
    Also see the much larger digital archive of Whirlwind documents https://archivesspace.mit.edu/repositories/2/resources/1157/...
  • MarkusWandel 22 days ago
    My read on this is that Whirlwind was radical because it was 16 bit parallel. Previously anything to get a compute machine working would do, and bit serial is pretty natural. This one was designed from the get-go for speed.
    • stmw 22 days ago
      I think it's even more than that - it birthed SAGE and many other descendants. The wild thing is how readable and recognizable the ISA is. Someone ought to build an emulator...
  • aap_ 22 days ago
    Love the Whirlwind! i think of it as the original microcontroller, except not very micro of course. The 2kw address space is a bit small for bigger programs unfortunately, but it's still great fun to play with anyways.
  • timbit42 22 days ago
    The SAGE computers were scaled up versions of the MIT Whirlwind I.

    Later, the transistorized TX-0 and TX-2 computers were based on the MIT Whirlwind I. The DEC PDP-1 was based on the TX-2.

  • jecel 22 days ago
    Two years after this booklet, the CRT memory it describes was replaced by core memory (becoming the first computer to use that technology).
    • stmw 22 days ago
      Indeed, for those interested, the Whirlwind archives include a lot of details on Jay Forrester's core memory, as well.
  • ggm 23 days ago
    Not implying whirlwind is the ur-machine, or originated terms of art, just noting that a lot of language in 1951 could be understood to apply in a domain-specific sense to a modern computer scientist: the jargon we use now, includes terms of art that these people use.

    They are therefore at least 75 years old.

  • radiator 22 days ago
    The booklet looks great.