Lost Doctor Who Episodes Found

(bbc.co.uk)

135 points | by edent 14 hours ago

10 comments

  • throwawaymobule 1 hour ago
    It's strange for formerly lost media to get a whole news story about it. This should, but still strange.

    Hope more are found sooner than another 13 years from now.

    • m463 25 minutes ago
      I think there's LOTS of media out there, but there doesn't seem to be easy ways to convert it.

      There was probably a renaissance period when conversion equipment was being actively developed and available, but that time is probably gone. For example I think a good film scanner would be the Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED, but current state of the art falls far short. For film, vcr tapes and more we should be doing so much better.

      I have old family super-8 films that are kind of convertible, but not the magnetic sound strip.

      • schlauerfox 19 minutes ago
        If you have something precious on home movie film, this lab in Burbank, CA that does a lot of the movies will have sometimes deals on film transfers for holidays, or you can call them for a quote. No relationship, but I did have some done and they were very good. https://www.pro8mm.com/
    • stronglikedan 4 minutes ago
      > still strange

      wrong doctor

    • nephihaha 1 hour ago
      There are several "holy grails" in British TV history.

      Lost Doctor Who episodes are one of them. Dad's Army also has lost black and white episodes (the colour ones have been repeated ad nauseam all my lifetime).

      I can think of a few others. Scotch on the Rocks was a political hit piece written by Douglas Hurd showing an armed Scottish uprising along the lines of Northern Ireland. It was supposed to frighten people away from Scottish nationalism, but ended up causing copycat incidents. It vanished shortly after being broadcast probably because of its unintended effects.

      The ultimate would be some of the pre-WW2 television broadcasts. Most of these were broadcast in the London area and practically nowhere else. Almost no one had recording equipment back then and they were often broadcast live.

      • ahartmetz 39 minutes ago
        I just wanted to mention at this opportunity that some British TV series from the late 70s, early 80s are absolutely brilliant and some of the best stuff I have ever watched. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Smiley's People, Danger UXB, Sandbaggers and Sherlock Holmes are some of my favorites.
    • zahlman 1 hour ago
      Why should that be strange?
  • MrGinkgo 2 hours ago
    Film cans? I thought the whole reason the series was missing was because it was shot on video, and then the tapes were wiped after shooting?
    • mikehall314 1 hour ago
      You're correct but as Uvix has said, BBC Enterprises made film copies for overseas sales before the original tapes were erased.

      The earliest episode to survive on its original videotape is Ambassadors of Death episode 1 from 1970. None of the original 60s tapes still survive, though I believe there is at least one tape that we know used to have Doctor Who on it but which now has another programme.

      The earliest episode to survive in its original medium is possibly The Dalek Invasion of Earth episode 5 (The Waking Ally). That's because, while this was shot on electronic studio cameras as usual, there were no videotape machines available to record.

      Instead the output of those cameras was telerecorded straight to 35mm film. AIUI the negative of that telerecording still exists.

      • WalterBright 1 hour ago
        > there is at least one tape that we know used to have Doctor Who on it but which now has another programme.

        Recording over another recording does not completely erase the other. I wonder if it could be recovered.

        • mikehall314 1 hour ago
          It has been suggested numerous times, but the BBC didn’t just record over the top - the tapes were erased with a degausser before reuse.
    • gwbas1c 1 hour ago
      The BBC used a kinescope much longer than the US. (A kinescope recorded TV to film.)

      The US pushed a lot harder than Europe for videotape because kinescopes dropped frames off of American 60i frame rates, but worked really well for European 50i frame rates. Thus the BBC continued to use kinescopes for a long time.

    • Uvix 2 hours ago
      Film prints were made for overseas sales.
  • beardyw 12 hours ago
    I remember wanting to love Dr Who even before it was broadcast. The TARDIS was great, but the first series was disappointing. Like so many others, it was the first sight (and sound) of a Dalek which vindicated my hopes.
  • pessimizer 3 hours ago
    I was afraid this would never happen again. Two very good episodes, too.

    I just pray that we'll get to see a few more Troughton episodes. He's the doctor that set the standard that all future doctors followed, yet the least known because the moronic BBC wiped basically his entire run, and now we only have about half of it.

    Tom Baker was "my Doctor" because he's the one who made me love the show when I was a kid, but Troughton (and Zoë and Jamie) are my favorite era.

    edit: Zoë and Jamie are from way back when the companions were expected to be useful, before Sarah Jane. Zoë was better at math than the Doctor; imagine them doing anything like that now.

    • NetMageSCW 2 hours ago
      Companions are still useful, they just bring different skills to the Doctor (humanity?).
    • hnlmorg 1 hour ago
      That era of companions was a response to the eras before then when companions were expected to just look pretty and scream on cue.
  • hoyd 12 hours ago
    Perhaps the doctor meant for these to be lost and not found, or that the daleks was afraid of them?
    • nephihaha 7 hours ago
      I think Doctor Who was finding its feet in the Hartnell era and it was Troughton who really first defined the character to what he became later.

      In the Hartnell era, the Doctor was a grandfather I think, looked old (although Hartnell was much younger than he appeared, thanks to the war etc) and seems to have been human.

  • zenon_paradox 4 hours ago
    [dead]
  • OutOfHere 6 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • Anonbrit 2 hours ago
      People have been making the same complaint about Dr Who for at least 40 years, couched in the language of the day. Same with Star Trek.
    • afavour 2 hours ago
      I view Doctor Who as part of a great tradition of sci-fi that pushes boundaries. Tennant's era was a primetime TV show that featured gay characters (Captain Jack in particular) without treating it like it was a big deal. When at the time it really wasn't that common (particularly in kid-friendly TV).

      These attempts overshoot at times, like when Star Trek TNG put male crew members in "skants"[1] but they can always course correct. If you let minor things like that ruin your viewing of the show then that's on you, not them.

      [1] https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Starfleet_uniform_(2350...

      • iso1631 2 hours ago
        > These attempts overshoot at times, like when Star Trek TNG

        On the other hand the entire run of the "progressive" Star Trek didn't have a single gay character until 2016 - not even in guest stars (well there was the whole Dax/Trill thing, and the "non binary" character with Riker)

    • draygonia 3 hours ago
      David Tennant was a great Doctor Who. It's definitely still a good show and I'm sure they didn't swap out the entire production cast between those seasons to 'wokify' it.
  • shablulman 13 hours ago
    [dead]
  • mrlonglong 3 hours ago
    We have all the voice recordings, feed that into AI along with the extant episodes and it should be able to regenerate (geddit?) the missing episodes.
    • HughParry 1 hour ago
      Somebody spent a small fortune trying this a while ago with disliked results https://nypost.com/2025/04/13/entertainment/ailing-doctor-wh...
      • zamadatix 36 minutes ago
        They seem to have been pleased with the results:

        > “It has to be worth it for the pleasure it’s brought me to see them,” Levine said. “Doctor Who runs all night in my bedroom, complete, nothing missing.”

    • skerit 2 hours ago
      Do we also have stills of all the episodes? Or only audio?
      • TetOn 2 hours ago
        There are production stills that are used like a slide show and combined with the recorded audio. Certain episodes have been reconstructed using animation such that the basic scene blocking and events are played out alongside the recorded audio.
    • waltbosz 2 hours ago
      Feels a bit like Jurassic Park
      • BurningFrog 1 hour ago
        The risk of the episodes going wild and kill lawyers seems minimal though.
        • razingeden 1 hour ago
          Then what is AI even good for? :(
        • panzagl 1 hour ago
          Risk or benefit?
    • benj111 2 hours ago
      From a utilitarian pov yes. But that's completely missing the artistic point. Why shoot a film when you could just feed the script into an AI?
      • mrlonglong 2 hours ago
        It could recreate missing episodes using the extant episodes. That's something worthwhile doing until someone finds them. It's not creating a complete new series.
        • Mordisquitos 1 hour ago
          People want to find the missing episodes because of their historical value as actual human artistic creations, and not because they want to watch a thing that looks like an old missing episode.

          There would be as much value in an "AI-recreated" missing episode as there would be in taking the audio of a modern episode and using AI to create a new video track for it.

          • zamadatix 34 minutes ago
            > People want to find the missing episodes because...

            Speak for yourself!

        • tracker1 2 hours ago
          Even if it's motion comic level animation, it'd still be nice to see combined with the audio recordings.