I like this a lot An interesting next iteration would be to add a functionality that evaluates a user's work for inefficiencies and suggests where they can improve cut cost. Might be outside the scope of your project, but it could be interesting.
> The interface is an interactive terminal UI built with Ink (React for terminals)
Just like Claude Code btw.
I'm working on a custom harness because I don't like or trust some of the ones out there, so I'm going to build one purely for myself and my own needs to see just how they work, and figure out some of what you've learned by looking at how Claude works, so I might add your project to my list of tooling to look at.
you are right. thats cursor-agent (the CLI), not the Cursor IDE. CodeBurn only parses the IDE's state.vscdb right now. cursor agent keeps transcripts under ~/.cursor/projects/*/agent-transcripts/ which we dont read yet.
The $200/month plan throttles you when you hit limits - you just wait in a queue. API usage at $1400/week means unthrottled, parallel execution with no waiting. These are very different use cases, and for teams or heavy automation workflows the API cost can make sense if the time savings justify it.
Just like Claude Code btw.
I'm working on a custom harness because I don't like or trust some of the ones out there, so I'm going to build one purely for myself and my own needs to see just how they work, and figure out some of what you've learned by looking at how Claude works, so I might add your project to my list of tooling to look at.
[1] https://github.com/cordwainersmith/Claudoscope
filed an issue to add it: https://github.com/AgentSeal/codeburn/issues/55
cursor support only landed yesterday, so CLI is next. thanks for catching it.
holy slop. the $200/month plan has NEVER hit rate limits for me and I often run 5+ tabs of concurrent agents in a large 300k LoC codebase
In my case I mostly consume every bit of the weekly subscription.