Books are not too expensive

(millersbookreview.com)

26 points | by herbertl 2 days ago

9 comments

  • vhanda 1 hour ago
    The bigger problem for me is buying Ebooks without DRM, which are cheaper than the paperback. I see no reason why I should be paying the same (or often more) than the paperback version.

    Just let me buy the ebook and let me own it.

    Right now, after pirating it, I have to find the author's patreon / something and contribute some money that way. It shouldn't be this hard to give someone money.

    • deepsun 1 minute ago
      Is it hard to buy non-DRM books?

      Well, if you bought Kindle, then I see, but... don't buy Kindle? There are plenty other options.

    • Ferret7446 33 minutes ago
      Because you're primarily paying for the copyright. The cost of a book is fairly trivial
      • vynase 28 minutes ago
        Not with paper prices where they are these days.
  • mchl-mumo 10 minutes ago
    I think an issue that isn't addressed is that books feel more expensive not compared to the 60s benchmark, but say compared to free online resources with comparable information. I'm defaulting more to online circulated pdf books and only buy the book when I have liked it and want the physical copy as a keepsake.
  • II2II 16 minutes ago
    I've never been a big buyer of new books since they were always kinda expensive. That was especially true as a child. It is still somewhat true as an adult. The place where I notice the greatest change in price is in the used end of the market, and that is mostly because the types of places where I would source cheap books seem to be less common. (When I do stumble across those places today, they are just as cheap. Maybe cheaper. Yet they are also harder to find.)

    That said, the bigger issue is likely perception. The value of a book is lowered by the free reading material you can find online. An ereader is roughly the price of an archaic feeling dead-tree textbook. The glut of books chasing market trends means that you are more likely to end up with chaff than wheat. While the great books may be worth their sticker price, the pedestrian ones definitely have to compete with those perceptions.

  • A_D_E_P_T 1 hour ago
    At some point you just have to move to Ebooks. It's way cheaper (usually ~6x cheaper) and it's much more convenient, as you always have your entire library with you. Sometimes even in duplicate, i.e. on more than one device at the same time, in the same place.

    I was very reluctant to make the move at first, as I love everything about physical books -- their feel, the way they smell, the cover art -- but I was accumulating too many, and finding space was becoming a hassle. The adjustment period was short, and now I'd rather have my reader over a physical book.

    The only exceptions I'd make are for reference books that don't have good electronic versions on account of graphics or tables that don't render properly.

    • mananaysiempre 50 minutes ago
      > At some point you just have to move to Ebooks.

      When I can get a godsdamned file and view it on whatever I want with whatever program I want, sure. But I usually can’t.

    • asenchi 20 minutes ago
      Never. It never makes sense to me, why would I want to carry around another computer to read? Why can’t I unplug and enjoy my book? I tried it, it sucked and management was even worse.
  • chromacity 46 minutes ago
    Using a 1960s book as a benchmark feels weird to me. I'd expect books to be more expensive when they come out and less expensive when they're the fiftieth low-cost reprint 60 years later. Sure, it's a classic, but it's hardly a "must-have". At best, it's something you need to read for school, although many school districts have dropped it from their lists.

    Having said that, I think the complaints about book prices are mostly an excuse for preferring to spend time on social media or download pirated books for free.

    Leaving aside the question of whether they're priced "correctly" or whether the publishers are greedy, books are cheaper than a Doordash meal or a computer game we never finish. Would the average person really read more books if they were $4.99 instead of $29.95?

    • allturtles 33 minutes ago
      > Using a 1960s book as a benchmark feels weird to me. I'd expect books to be more expensive when they come out and less expensive when they're the fiftieth low-cost reprint 60 years later.

      Well it doesn't matter. Even if you compare to books that are newly published, new hardcover fiction is not $43-54. Typical is about $30.

  • brudgers 3 hours ago
    The floor price of books is higher these days because the ordinary paperback is dead and and trade-paperbacks are the lowest cost option and they tend to be most of the cost of a hardback.
  • analogpixel 55 minutes ago
    Can we get rid of hard cover books yet?
    • mananaysiempre 49 minutes ago
      Not if we want them to survive in a decent condition for more than a couple of decades, no.
    • mystraline 50 minutes ago
      Not at all.

      Online DRMed or "streamed" books can be modified or deleted.

      Its kinda hard (aka impossible) to edit or delete a hardbound book on my bookshelf remotely.

  • mystraline 54 minutes ago
    Yes, I agree. Libgen, Scihub, Anna's Library, and Archive.org with de-DRM is completely free.

    If the fucks like Altman and ilk can run 'pirate everything and sell the proceeds', you damned right I'll pirate without selling anything. And I won't even feel bad.

    The professional pirates normally were charged criminally. Nope, now theyre too big to fail.

    • dahdum 5 minutes ago
      Why even bother with the justification? We’ve heard these same arguments for decades, but this one is flimsier than most.

      RIAA is bad, so I’ll pirate music.

      MPAA is bad, so I’ll pirate movies.

      AAA Studios are bad, so I’ll pirate games.

      AI is bad, so I’ll pirate books?!?

  • zb3 1 hour ago
    The only one I'd want sadly is.. https://newandroidbook.com/