Airlines Can't Charge You for What You Wear

(voyagecoat.com)

17 points | by mooreds 3 hours ago

6 comments

  • rationalist 51 minutes ago
    It appears to be a rebrand of a cheaper item:

    https://www.amazon.com/BVASJIUK-Voyage-Coat-Travel-Pockets/d...

    The photo on the homepage appears to be identical to the photo in the Amazon listing (on my phone).

    (Or whomever is manufacturing for the company is trying to undercut the company that hired them.)

  • bushwart 44 minutes ago
    Looks great for summer. The many pockets seem especially practical for organizing wads of travel cash and supplements like creatine, protein powder, magnesium capsules, etc. They should consider producing a niqab version for Middle Eastern countries like Saudi Arabia.
    • rationalist 29 minutes ago
      > wads of travel cash

      Be very careful about this. It is a good way to get your money "stolen" through Civil Asset Forfeiture:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the_United...

      > A 2020 study found that the median cash forfeiture in 21 states which track such data was $1,300

      It doesn't have to be a lot of cash, and in fact smaller amounts are more likely to be taken so that there is less of a fight to try to get it back.

    • OutOfHere 30 minutes ago
      I strongly advise keeping all supplements in a checked bag, with good written labels about what they are. I keep them in ziploc bags with very clear labels. For mixed stacks, write DAILY VITAMINS, DAILY PROTEIN, etc.

      If you carry them with you while going through security, you're just asking to be strip searched and questioned.

  • marcta 3 hours ago
    There is a reason that luggage has to be weighed. If you watch Mentour Pilot, there's a not insignificant number of plane accidents (and outright disasters) that occur due to the plane weight being calculated incorrectly, and thereby running out of fuel.

    https://www.evionica.com/blog/blog/how-much-the-passenger-we...

    • wavemode 42 minutes ago
      Carry-on luggage is usually not weighed, there are simply safety margins in place for that sort of thing. (A human probably isn't capable of carrying a bag heavy enough to erode those margins.)

      And fuel burn is the least of the concerns when it comes to weight - a far bigger issue is how it affects balance and engine lift. But on a plane the size of a jet airliner, this too is almost never a real concern when it comes to passenger weight - a standard weight is just assumed for each passenger and their carryon. (It's a concern for cargo weight, but that's why cargo is always weighed and balanced properly.)

      Maybe if the airline notices that all the passengers are sitting on the left (for some strange reason) or something like that, they would reseat people.

    • nradov 53 minutes ago
      Running out of fuel isn't the real concern. It's more about center of balance and aircraft performance (ability to climb with an engine out).
    • lispisok 48 minutes ago
      Cant recall ever being weighed as a passenger and in this day and age you have passengers who are 120 lbs and 300 lbs yet you get penalized if your suitcase is 1 lbs over the limit.
    • rationalist 59 minutes ago
      Wouldn't it be possible to install strain gauges in the landing gears to determine the plane's weight?
  • gaiagraphia 3 hours ago
    Hehe, I remember doing stuff like wearing 8 t-shirts back in the day to try and travel for £1 around Europe.

    Currently feel like I'm living on the edge by 1-bagging an Osprey Farpoint 40. My heart races every time I'm at the gate, and I feel I've perfected a masterclass in illusion by angling my body, distracting the gate staff, moving my hands to draw attention, etc (note: I probably look like an idiot - but it's fun to dream).

    The optimal solution is just to weigh everybody as they board the plane and bill them accordingly, lol. But I don't think that'd go down too well.

    If these jackets can hold 5kg, and there's 200 passengers donning them, that's a ton of weight, which is about $100 per flight in extra fuel?

    Wonder if the fairest way to charge for this is aa ringfenced externality tax on the product itself; calculating the average amount of fuel such products burn in an average lifespan. Would be preferable to airlines dictating what you can and can't wear...

    • genxy 2 hours ago
      The next one will be a body suit so you end up looking like Santa Claus.
      • Qem 2 hours ago
        Next would be taxing airways and using the resources to subsidize the costs of GLP class drugs, as they benefit directly from customer weight loss.
        • TomatoCo 54 minutes ago
          Vaguely reminds me of that planet in Hitchhiker's Guide that started to lose too much mass to tourists leaving. So,

          > Thus today the net balance between the amount you eat and the amount you excrete while on the planet is surgically removed from your body weight when you leave; so every time you go to the lavatory there, it is vitally important to get a receipt.

  • xnx 19 minutes ago
    This is an ad.
  • netsharc 49 minutes ago
    I was curious to see it in action, obviously it's not on YouTube yet (it's a pre-order, which makes me think vaporware), but here's a review of a similar thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU7UrhrpWGI

    I suppose with the continued enshittification of air travel, jackets like this will be more common, and the sight of passengers with bulky clothing at airports will no longer be strange.

    I was travelling the last few weeks, and wearing a jacket in an airport in warmer countries would make me look very out of place.