5 comments

  • mosura 19 minutes ago
    Someone should use this to do the exact opposite of the intention: filter for “offensive” content, and boost it or collate it into a newsletter/email blast for people of culture.

    You have to give it to Mistral they do at least know what the market near them says they want right now. The great problem is in a few years of this that market won’t be worth anything.

  • fastball 20 minutes ago
    Should've called it Safestral.

    Also I do like Mistral's seemingly newer strategy of focusing on smaller, more fine-tuned models for various use-cases, presumably the result of their large MoE models not competing effectively with the frontier models.

  • nezhar 1 hour ago
  • petcat 27 minutes ago
    Mistral needs to abandon their Everything-stral branding. Getting kind of lame.

    "Shieldstral" is an awkward and bad name

    • braiamp 26 minutes ago
      That naming only works if you commit to the bit even when it doesn't make sense. That builds branding.
  • lenerdenator 35 minutes ago
    I'd really like to see more conversation around Mistral's models. It's good to see Europe developing AI.
    • BlackRabbit1 26 minutes ago
      The problem is that their performance is too far away from the latest generation of Asian models.

      They had kept up in the mid-range a few years ago. But this standing is sadly long gone.

      If you need a fast Opensource'ed LLMs you can go for EU-hosted DeepSeek or Qwen.

    • selectively 6 minutes ago
      [dead]