8 comments

  • tristanj 56 minutes ago
    Per the court ruling [0], the specific law that Meta violated was New Mexico’s public-nuisance law, NMSA 1978 § 30-8-1. This is the relevant section that was violated [1]:

    A public nuisance consists of knowingly creating, performing or maintaining anything affecting any number of citizens without lawful authority which is either:

    - A. injurious to public health, safety, morals or welfare; or

    - B. interferes with the exercise and enjoyment of public rights, including the right to use public property.

    Whoever commits a public nuisance for which the act or penalty is not otherwise prescribed by law is guilty of a petty misdemeanor.

    The judge found that Meta’s operation of Facebook and Instagram created a public nuisance which injured public health, safety, and welfare; and burdened public schools, hospitals, and law enforcement. This resulted in Meta being ordered to pay $567 million into a fund to abate the harm done.

    [0] https://www.kob.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/D-101-CV-2023...

    [1] https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/chapter-30/article-8...

    • qwe----3 28 minutes ago
      These rulings are stupid and if generalized would make doing business impossible. Parents should parent their kids. That law is so board - "public morals"? Should every porn site be taken down?
      • tw04 16 minutes ago
        The world would almost assuredly be a better place if 14 year olds were looking at playboy magazines instead of having easy access to every fetish under the sun. It has distorted many a young man’s ideas of intimacy and sexual relations.
      • fivetenpen 18 minutes ago
        Yes they should, but guess what they’re doing instead? Scrolling.

        Engagement algorithm needs to be made illegal.

      • techblueberry 19 minutes ago
        > Should every porn site be taken down?

        I mean, I like porn as much as the next guy, but probably yes?

        • sneak 4 minutes ago
          I’m curious the moral basis for which you have appointed yourself more qualified than the adult viewers themselves about what adults should be able to view in their web browser.
      • popalchemist 14 minutes ago
        They actively spent hundreds of millions of dollars deliberately creating chatbots that would engage in sex acts with minors. It was known to Zuckerberg and approved by him explicitly. That isn't a parenting issue, that is predation at scale.
      • homeonthemtn 13 minutes ago
        Yes. It's ok to say no to porn and gore. I'm tired of acting like we need it to survive otherwise some dystopian genie will be unleashed. Get rid of that shit.
        • sneak 4 minutes ago
          You are of course free to not view it. Why do you think that you should decide for others what they should view? How do you know better than they do, what they should or should not be viewing?
    • judge2020 52 minutes ago
      Is there also a sort-of injunction to stop doing x y z? Or is just existing as a social media company a public nuisance?
      • tristanj 45 minutes ago
        From the article:

        The company must also enact certain safety features such as limiting the amount of time underage users in the state spend on Facebook and Instagram, hiding by default the number of “likes” on photos for such people and disclosing to users there the risks of its platforms.

        For users under 18, Meta will eliminate push notifications during night time (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM) on all days; and from 8:00 AM to 3:00 PM on school days during the academic year. They will also limit the usage of Facebook and Instagram to 90 hours per month.

        TBH, these restrictions will just push kids to use Snapchat.

        • ElProlactin 33 minutes ago
          > They will also limit the usage of Facebook and Instagram to 90 hours per month.

          When you consider that the average person is awake for somewhere between 450 and 500 hours per month, 90 hours still represents ~20% of waking time.

          For comparison, a K-12 student spends 110-140 hours per month at school. So this is still a ridiculous amount of time for anyone to be spending on social media, teen or adult.

  • majorchord 1 hour ago
    I wonder how many billions it would take every year for this to not just be considered "cost of doing business"?
    • cadamsdotcom 1 hour ago
      This is the "slap on the wrist, don't do it again".

      A future judge will not be so kind if they keep doing it.

      Being punitive the first time is unwise because it invites abuse by others seeking an advantage.

      • nvme0n1p1 26 minutes ago
        > Being punitive the first time is unwise

        I'm not so sure this is the first time. 100th, maybe.

  • drivebyhooting 35 minutes ago
    What benefit do kids draw from instagram and facebook?
    • sneak 2 minutes ago
      Well, Instagram DMs have entirely replaced sms and phone number exchange for an entire generation. This is like saying “what benefit do teenagers draw from having a phone line?”
    • SkipperCat 32 minutes ago
      There's a lot of benefit, but its all to META shareholders...
  • mrbluecoat 1 hour ago
    Nice to read about, but will be appealed to eternity.
  • lol8675309 53 minutes ago
    sure. can't wait for the checks.
  • vithlani 5 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • Ozzie-D 20 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • animanoir 18 minutes ago
    [dead]