"smallest possible" is exactly one instruction; possibly 0xc3 [ret] or 0x90 [nop]; the problem lies in how you define "complete Windows application", because the answer really differs depending on if you want to make it ABI compliant. But there's nothing preventing you from creating a custom loader/executor that reads a pure binary file, maps it as exec and runs it.
A .COM file is exactly that, a pure binary that just starts executing at the first byte. Mind you the loader for those has gotten a smidge bigger since its first version...
Putting the search terms "Windows" and "assembly language" turns up all sort of books. The one that got me to initially explore the topic (from 1993).... [0]
For a more up to date treatment of assembly and windows.... comes with source code for the IDE also. Ray Seyfarth's book [1].
[0] Windows Assembly Language & Systems Programming: Object Oriented & Low-Level Systems Programming in Assembly Language for Windows 3.X
[1] Introduction to 64 Bit Windows Assembly Language Programming: Fourth Edition
ISBN-13: 978-1543138849, ISBN-10: 1543138845
Interesting to bypass CRT and work directly against the Windows API. That said, these rely on USER.32.DLL and KERNEL32.DLL to do the majority of the heavy lifting.
It's a bit like 'smallest hello world in assembly' but the code is just setting up the calling convention and then passing the zero-terminated character string into `write`. Cool, but that could be done a bit more straightforwardly in C, too. A lot of assembly (including in the linked repository) is book-keeping for the platform's calling convention.
> no, you can also call ntdll (or even syscalls although those aren't stable), there's plenty of documentation on the internet
I mean officially. Yes, you can find some on the internet, but nothing on the official MSDN.
> but also why would you, not much point except for very niche functionality
Exactly. Using system DLL API is backward and forward compatible, and just as standardized and well-documented as the POSIX API. I see no problem relying on it.
(Sidenote: as a bonus, MSDN is surprisingly good, understandable, well organized, lots of examples. I rarely say this, but well done MS, that's how a dev doc should be.)
KERNEL32.DLL (in spite of the name) provides user-mode system services for the Windows API. The CRT provides the C99 API. There are many entry points to the same thing on Windows; you can do any of `malloc`/`HeapAlloc`/`new`/`VirtualAlloc` to get a void* memory buffer. `malloc` is from the CRT; `HeapAlloc` is from KERNEL32.DLL, and `new` is from the C++ runtime.
“Runs a Windows message loop
Has a title bar, minimize, maximize, and close buttons, which all work as expected
Has a system menu with the same
Paints the background and some text centered in the middle, equal to or larger than "Dave's Tiny App"”
That Linux program:
“Let’s take an incredibly simple program, one that does nothing but return a number back to the operating system”
You know? FOR ONE expression our current neuralese-spewing friends could standarize on - I'd not mind this one (and the ilk) becoming "load-bearing", again.-
I should try FASM to see if it produces a smaller size exe. COM files are small, but 16-bit DOS was the thing back in the day - 100H yeah and basically a memory dump.
What about his contributions to human civilization? ;)
He got a world record score on the Tempest arcade game [1], then developed an AI which beat his own record[2]. His biggest failure was, that after rebuilding TEMPEST from arcade machine ROMS, he added levels to the game but never made them public [3].
It's frustrating, because he does do some cool things. But I had to quit following him because of his constant yarning about how he grew up not rich and made millions from Microsoft, so young people now are stupid and lazy.
My how the overton window has moved. Some of violative conduct is standard practice now.
> When consumers prepared to purchase a product, additional services and products including a $9.95 back-up disc and $4.95 ‘optional extended service’ plan appeared on the check-out form. The form also listed “one free year of updates” – selected by default – but the company was then authorized to automatically charge a consumer’s credit card at the end of the year unless the buyer cancels the update plan.
> Inducing computer users to install software by misrepresenting that the user's computer is at risk for crashes or privacy and security invasions.
> Marketing its InternetShield software by means of a “free scan.”
> Using “buttons” in its advertisements that do not function as the user would expect them. For example, the X found in the corner of a window is normally associated with closing the window and should not open another ad.
Installing software on a user’s computer that causes multiple pop-up advertisements when the user tries to close out of advertisements.
> Failing to provide a functional uninstall option for removing all software files.
> Failing to obtain a consumer’s explicit consent to purchase a product or a service.
love this and it's timely as I think with AI more of my code will just be native assembly for example: https://github.com/taf2/tic-tac-toe my m series native assembly based tic tac toe windowed game... very portable too you just simply execute codex --yolo port my app to x y z host...
I haven't played with yolo yet. I'll have to use my airgapped, old Lenovo ThinkPad for this! Whenever I see yolo, I can't stop thinking of Joseph Redmon's YOLO and his astounding resume format!
Putting the search terms "Windows" and "assembly language" turns up all sort of books. The one that got me to initially explore the topic (from 1993).... [0]
For a more up to date treatment of assembly and windows.... comes with source code for the IDE also. Ray Seyfarth's book [1].
[0] Windows Assembly Language & Systems Programming: Object Oriented & Low-Level Systems Programming in Assembly Language for Windows 3.X
[1] Introduction to 64 Bit Windows Assembly Language Programming: Fourth Edition ISBN-13: 978-1543138849, ISBN-10: 1543138845
It's a bit like 'smallest hello world in assembly' but the code is just setting up the calling convention and then passing the zero-terminated character string into `write`. Cool, but that could be done a bit more straightforwardly in C, too. A lot of assembly (including in the linked repository) is book-keeping for the platform's calling convention.
Since the low-level Windows kernel API is undocumented and non-public, using these system DLLs is your only option on Windows.
It's just like linking against libc.so on any POSIX systems.
but also why would you, not much point except for very niche functionality
I mean officially. Yes, you can find some on the internet, but nothing on the official MSDN.
> but also why would you, not much point except for very niche functionality
Exactly. Using system DLL API is backward and forward compatible, and just as standardized and well-documented as the POSIX API. I see no problem relying on it.
(Sidenote: as a bonus, MSDN is surprisingly good, understandable, well organized, lots of examples. I rarely say this, but well done MS, that's how a dev doc should be.)
“Runs a Windows message loop Has a title bar, minimize, maximize, and close buttons, which all work as expected Has a system menu with the same Paints the background and some text centered in the middle, equal to or larger than "Dave's Tiny App"”
That Linux program:
“Let’s take an incredibly simple program, one that does nothing but return a number back to the operating system”
See https://archive.is/w01DO#selection-265.0-265.44 for a fairer comparison (97/133 bytes)
PS. Honest take :)
https://www.grc.com/freepopular.htm
... the days! :)
Nowadays he spreads misinformation disguised as war stories from his time at Microsoft.
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39813625
He got a world record score on the Tempest arcade game [1], then developed an AI which beat his own record[2]. His biggest failure was, that after rebuilding TEMPEST from arcade machine ROMS, he added levels to the game but never made them public [3].
[1]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuSMCWu02hA
[2]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdbpoDjIvPk
[3]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjsVSEbXDOM
> When consumers prepared to purchase a product, additional services and products including a $9.95 back-up disc and $4.95 ‘optional extended service’ plan appeared on the check-out form. The form also listed “one free year of updates” – selected by default – but the company was then authorized to automatically charge a consumer’s credit card at the end of the year unless the buyer cancels the update plan.
> Inducing computer users to install software by misrepresenting that the user's computer is at risk for crashes or privacy and security invasions.
> Marketing its InternetShield software by means of a “free scan.”
> Using “buttons” in its advertisements that do not function as the user would expect them. For example, the X found in the corner of a window is normally associated with closing the window and should not open another ad. Installing software on a user’s computer that causes multiple pop-up advertisements when the user tries to close out of advertisements.
> Failing to provide a functional uninstall option for removing all software files.
> Failing to obtain a consumer’s explicit consent to purchase a product or a service.