11 comments

  • GolfPopper 1 hour ago
    >Our mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.

    Pull the other one. It's got bells on.

  • trueno 45 minutes ago
    i think a lot of people don't realize how far not just nation-states are willing to go, but bajillionaire entities are willing to go to control any given narrative now that AI is so accessible. ig comments, tiktok comments, reddit comments, hn comments, on seemingly innocuous and harmless content, just out there trying to look real and game the perception. these entities are well aware that people go to comments and discussion for "the real tea" and yeah. marketing behemoths offer "social media engagement" packages to entities like disney to push trailer hype. flood youtube and other socials with fake content engagement. i remember within the first like minute disney dropped the latest tron trailer on youtube, it was absolutely flooded with "i'm not ready" "omggggg" caliber comments from seemingly real looking youtube profiles.

    bring back lan parties, aol instant messenger and throw the current platforms into the sun

    • quietbritishjim 13 minutes ago
      I agree with a lot of what you're saying but on this point:

      > i remember within the first like minute disney dropped the latest tron trailer on youtube, it was absolutely flooded with "i'm not ready" "omggggg" caliber comments from seemingly real looking youtube profiles.

      Disney is too much of a faceless corporation to both with something like that. Especially since, why would anyone be convinced a trailer is good from an astroturfed comment? You're looking at the same content. It's different from a HN comment from an apparent expert who's supposedly verifying that an article is true.

      The final nail in the coffin is that I've met plenty of people who really who react like that to a new Disney video.

  • MomsAVoxell 1 hour ago
    We should be tracking and identifying all covert influence campaigns, from all states - not just Russia - and collecting a registry of these efforts for wide public distribution.

    We should also be tracking and identifying all covert influence campaigns of our own government, too, while we’re at it.

    In fact, all covert influence, everywhere, should be identified and made overt.

    It is the covert nature of the influence that is the most insidious aspect, incompatible with free and open society.

    So yeah, let’s start at home by disassembling the national security apparatus which allows covert influence to be wielded against The People. After all, anything less than full exposure is hypocrisy.

    More leaks now!

    Perhaps there will be an application of LLM’s towards identifying covert influence, which we can apply to a corpus and identify its true authorship. This would be pretty useful for a lot of things, eh ..

    • dgellow 10 minutes ago
      > We should be tracking and identifying all covert influence campaigns, from all states - not just Russia - and collecting a registry of these efforts for wide public distribution.

      Close to nothing happened after Snowden leaks. The republican party has been able to convince pretty much everybody that the Mueller report was a hoax, a report that very explicitly found collusion between Russia and US operatives close to Trump, so bad that his own guys went to prison. The 2nd trump admin destroyed the cyber monitoring apparatus and might have let Russian hackers access citizens data.

      I don’t think there is anything to be expected from the US at this point.

  • hackernud3s 1 hour ago
    Does it seem strange that Russia would go with Israel to astroturf credibility?
    • edu 29 minutes ago
      No, Israel has maintained relations with the Kremlin and has refused to impose sanctions against them, as well as rejected calls to send military aid to Ukraine.
    • villish 33 minutes ago
      Evangelical Christians are the target audience. They are strong supporters of Israel because of their interpretation of the bible.
    • ReptileMan 20 minutes ago
      If you want to understand Israel - think of it as Eastern European country that is geographically misplaced. Kremlin knows how to pass convincingly as them. And Israel is a wedge issue.

      In psyops - discord is the goal.

      • karmakurtisaani 16 minutes ago
        Nah man, most EE countries want to be aligned with the EU. Unless you mean Belarus.
    • venzaspa 51 minutes ago
      It depends on who your target audience is.
  • andOlga 1 hour ago
    Even as a speaker of the language I haven't a single bloody clue what a "hazzy" is. Is ChatGPT normally this bad at being prompted in one language to generate text in another, or is this an operator fuckup, I wonder?
    • codedokode 24 minutes ago
      Could it be "hazy", which is supposed to mean "cloudy"? The word "cloudy" is often used in Russian for "unclear", "vague", for example, one could say: "Western countries are awaiting a cloudy perspectives due to discarding traditional values".

      You can notice one more example of original language leak in the quote from a report ("And she needs politicians...") where Germany is referred to as "she", because in Russian "Germany", as many other countries, has a female gender, so we call it "she", not "it". In English I usually see people using "it" for countries.

      • andOlga 20 minutes ago
        In the quote provided in the article, it's used as a noun: "unhackneyed perspective on hazzy". And literally the only thing I can think of is the acronym "hz", which is a rough equivalent of the English "idfk". Like someone prompted the bot to tell them the channel gives a perspective on "something, I don't know what". But even this is a stretch of stretches.
        • codedokode 1 minute ago
          The text could be truncated for some reason. Or maybe "hazzy" is an adjective before the bot link? "Hz" is translated by both Google and Yandex as "don't know".
    • thin_carapace 1 hour ago
      mixing languages results in huge hallucination increase from my experience
  • 0-_-0 42 minutes ago
    Why didn't Russia just use local models?
    • edu 33 minutes ago
      Because they want to influence the mainstream outside of their frontiers.
    • realusername 12 minutes ago
      Russian propaganda operations are not centralized, I'm sure some of them are using other models and for this one, the guy in charge decided to use ChatGPT
  • __coder__ 47 minutes ago
    Why didn't they used any Chinese open models?
    • dgellow 9 minutes ago
      They very likely also do that
    • codedokode 30 minutes ago
      Maybe they were not as good at the time, or the contractor just used to use ChatGPT. Also ChatGPT can be used without a phone number registration, unlike Chinese models.
    • edu 32 minutes ago
      How many user do the Chinese open models have and how many users do OpenAI have?
  • dandaka 1 hour ago
    This got me mixed feelings. I don't support such campaigns. Still I would prefer my AI tool to behave more like a notepad app and less like a government or a corporate censor.
    • tyre 50 minutes ago
      Ideally our government would regulate this, but our government is an absolute dumpster fire intent on destroying respect for America and gives no care for what’s best for its people.

      So, you know, we gotta take what we can get

      • pferde 42 minutes ago
        If there's a big centralized service that a lot of people use, there will always be the temptation to abuse it to influence those people.
  • jimbob45 1 hour ago
    We recently banned a cluster of ChatGPT accounts originating in Russia

    We banned a cluster of ChatGPT accounts that very likely originated in Russia.

    Methinks AI helped write this. Although…their evidence is pretty damning.

  • metalman 1 hour ago
    unfortunatly it appears to me that Russia has gone from doing good service providing a reasonable counter narative to the US/west, has become lazy and resorted to promoting convienient irrational and extreamist naratives present at the fringes of western societies, but worse for them and us, is that they are now consuming the excess product and activly meddling, not that our various 3 and 4 letter agencys are refraing from operating there, but it's all tedious and evil mean spirited, lacking any identifiable moral or cultural basis, just a dirty fight for power on both sides.
  • fsuts 30 minutes ago
    Open Ai is fighting for defence and other state contracts in USA and similar minded countries

    Writing about Russia negatively is in their interests, in reality all nation states are doing the same stuff

        “We banned a cluster of ChatGPT accounts that very likely originated in Russia. The operators prompted in Russian to generate social media comments that were posted on Substack, Telegram, X, Facebook and LinkedIn. Most of the comments they generated were in English, and the operators instructed ChatGPT to hide any linguistic clues that they were Russian. ”
    
    
    They replaced them the next day with English speakers and carried on as normal
    • dgellow 15 minutes ago
      You have to be able to keep two different things in your mind:

      - yes OpenAI benefits from talking about actions Russia is taking against other countries and how they handle that

      - and also, Russia is one of the worst actor in the politics and has been non stop active for more than a decade to destroy democratic systems from the inside

      You cannot just label something as irrelevant just because that benefits the one reporting the issue

    • 21asdffdsa12 23 minutes ago
      Joke aside, it is really hard to determine by goal- as russia has not these "talking" points chinese operators have. If you know the talking points handed of the month- you can very easily spot chinese propaganda.

      But russia, is just opinion-fog. Covering all.

      Occasionally - taking some sane take- and glueing some insane conspiracy to it, to discredit opposition.

      But the fog- that is really tough to filter for. For a time it was structure. The whole:

      "As a midwestern working joe.."