LG Says We're Fake News [video]

(youtube.com)

83 points | by HelloUsername 3 hours ago

5 comments

  • hadlock 18 minutes ago
    I deeply regret buying my LG. Originally the plan was to never connect it to wifi, and use an external device (chromecast, apple tv, or whatever) but my wife was too excited to try out whatever features. Unfortunately we can't sell the TV for anywhere what we paid for it new (to replace it with a different brand) so we're stuck with it for another ~7-10 years, or whatever the standard TV replacement interval is these days. New "apps" keep showing up on the main screen, which I have to "delete" from the main screen once a month or so (they're not deleted, they're just undeletable apps in some massive library of preinstalled spyware we can fortunately mostly hide). Apparently Sony OLED screens are LG "glass" but without the spyware.
    • dessimus 0 minutes ago
      >Apparently Sony OLED screens are LG "glass" but without the spyware.

      Without independent verification from someone like GN, I wouldn't trust "we installed rootkits" Sony not to be spying too.

    • literallyroy 6 minutes ago
      Why not reset it
  • dgellow 47 minutes ago
    This „we own the glass“ idea is completely insane. How does an industry degenerate to the point where they consider acceptable to base their business model on owning part of the product they sell you?
    • oh_my_goodness 19 minutes ago
      If you don't have laws, or don't enforce them, people will do whatever they want.

      I can remember when this simple point was obvious to almost everyone.

    • newsclues 19 minutes ago
      Sony and Microsoft fought to own the living room in console wars
    • mc32 34 minutes ago
      Marketing executives thinking “out of the box” is how. Ethics cannot contain them inside. They have breached the perimeter and now trample everyone for MRR.
  • add-sub-mul-div 35 minutes ago
    The crazy part of this is that LG did not fear flat out admitting they do fingerprint the audio of what you watch. I already knew that, but I can't imagine it's common knowledge yet. How long ago was it that that would have been the crazy untrue accusation?
  • ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago
  • PorciiVorbesc 2 hours ago
    Original Youtube title of the video I got a few hours ago was: "LG’s Manipulative, Gaslighting Response to GN Report"

    Either they changed it for some legal reason, or Youtube allows for A/B testing of multiple titles for engagement.

    • nodja 1 hour ago
      Youtube allows you to AB test with up to 3 titles and thumbnails.
    • kouteiheika 1 hour ago
      It's almost certainly A/B test. Essentially everyone does it.

      You can even sometimes see when a list of videos on YT first loads and a given video has one title, and it suddenly switches to another without you reloading the page.

      • neom 23 minutes ago
        Have you noticed that has become more common recently? Because I have. It seems over the past 3/4 months, reload and see a new title happens pretty much daily to me (it also seems to work because sometimes it causes me to click the video I didn't click with the old title).
      • kowbell 1 hour ago
        On several channels I watch, I've noticed the top comment is always along the lines of "who was here when the video title was XYZ" because you know it's going to change.
    • smashspectacle 1 hour ago
      YouTube encourages A/B testing of both titles and thumbnails, but it could be either.
    • ehe78qhe 1 hour ago
      [dead]