7 comments

  • taybin 20 minutes ago
    It’d be short sighted to not have a wrapper around which AI to use, even without implementation for them. Like, having an abstract parent class with a Siri implementation of it would be baseline good software engineering.
  • syntaxing 45 minutes ago
    I would pay a good chunk of money if Apple released a local AI hub to coordinate all AI usage locally (including photo indexing).
  • akie 27 minutes ago
    This is a very clever platform play. If you make Siri / your mac the central access point for all AI related workflows and make models interchangeable, then Apple has a huge weapon in the AI race.
    • freedomben 19 minutes ago
      I don't disagree, but I do feel the need to point out this was not Apple's plan A. Luckily for them they have so many tools and options at their disposal, that they are able to massively fail at developing their own models and still end up in a good position.
  • thallosaurus 42 minutes ago
    Don't they need that for China for compliance with their law?
    • Gareth321 30 minutes ago
      Possibly, but certainly the EU.
  • nicce 57 minutes ago
    That would be really cool, if you can route your local model for it.
  • Simulacra 30 minutes ago
    Siri, and Alexa, would be significantly more useful if it could be connected to ChatGPT etc.
    • pasc1878 9 minutes ago
      When I ask certain questions Siri asks if I want ChatGPT to answer it.
    • felixgallo 13 minutes ago
      Good news, Alexa+ (included with Prime) is already an Anthropic model, probably Sonnet.
  • vinni2 52 minutes ago
    Hmmm then why is it not available in EU?
    • Gareth321 27 minutes ago
      This appears to be the current feature prototype intended for the EU and potentially China. Apple has chosen not to release the new Siri AI in the EU because our Digital Markets Act requires them to allow interoperability. I.e. that users be allowed to choose another AI provider.

      Ostensibly they'll activate this in the EU when it's ready. Given the current functionality, it looks ready (or close to being ready). My guess is it is ready and Apple is doing their usual negotiation tactics with the EU to see who blinks first.

    • stetrain 31 minutes ago
      There’s a difference between Apple being able to swap out the model in code and Apple letting end users choose which model to use.
    • djc404 40 minutes ago
      I think it is because the EU is requiring broader access to the deeper layers that Apple doesn’t want to give.

      EDIT: by broader I mean all apps the user installs on their phone.