3 comments

  • dalemhurley 40 minutes ago
    Sovereign AI is going to be the next frontier. It’s apparent that all nations need to prepare themselves for possible challenges from foreign hyperscalers facing laws that are being rushed through to alleviate fear caused by fear mongers.
  • booi 1 hour ago
    let me guess.. regulatory capture?
    • fakedang 1 hour ago
      Maybe don't guess and read the article? European data sovereignty and CLOUD act.
      • dalemhurley 38 minutes ago
        Same thought I had.
      • guywithahat 20 minutes ago
        But "European data sovereignty" is regulatory capture, although it sort of reads like they had a US parent company to attend y combinator and raise money, but are now moving fully to Berlin, which is what they intended from the start.
        • 1718627440 11 minutes ago
          Isn't regulatory capture when a company shapes regulation to achieve business interests? How is this the case here?
          • nickff 5 minutes ago
            Excluding foreign competitors is a classic ‘regulatory capture’-style approach. Regulatory capture is (typically) a classic ‘bootleggers and baptists’ scenario where there are both good and bad reasons to enact the rules.
        • greggoB 11 minutes ago
          > But "European data sovereignty" is regulatory capture

          This doesn't match my understanding of regulatory capture [0] - is there any evidence that this company specifically orchestrated the EU's data protection laws in order to benefit from by blocking out competitors? Would be unexpected, since laws like GDPR predate its founding.

          [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture

  • vrganj 1 hour ago
    > US laws, including the Cloud Act, have created concerns across the market that American authorities could seek access to customer data.

    The CLOUD Act is becoming a bigger and bigger deal here in Europe. It definitely kills deals.

    • leonidasrup 51 minutes ago
      "Is the CLOUD Act only applicable to U.S. cloud service providers?"

      "No. The CLOUD Act applies to all electronic communication service or remote computing service providers that operate or have a legal presence in the U.S. For example, the CLOUD Act is also applicable to a cloud service provider that is headquartered in the EU and has operations in the United State"

      https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/cloud-act/

      • 1718627440 9 minutes ago
        > also applicable to a cloud service provider that is headquartered in the EU and has operations in the United State(sic)

        As if any company isn't going to create a subsidiary for that.

      • buildfocus 43 minutes ago
        Seems intentionally misleading. While I agree exposure to US surveillance in non-US providers likely isn't zero, it's significantly harder for the US to do this internationally for legal, practical & political reasons. AWS is not a neutral voice on their competitor's limitations.