America Didn't Lose Its Rare Earth Industry. It Sold It

(lawfaremedia.org)

58 points | by speckx 2 hours ago

6 comments

  • bubbluppugus 1 hour ago
    America didn't lose manufacturing jobs it sold them

    The whole economy for 40-ish years now been built on finance engineering away labors grip on anything in the US

    • bolangi 10 minutes ago
      Some analysts, notably Andre Martyanov, describe how the US has lost strategic thinking and long-range planning in the military domain. The loss of the US ability to mine and refine rare earths is a good example of absence of strategic thinking in the supply chain.
      • rylando 1 minute ago
        I’ve been wondering more and more lately if it was designed this way by whoever made these decisions at the top level to prevent another cold-war standoff situation.

        By requiring the US to rely on often adversarial countries to supply some of its most crucial military components like rare earth minerals, the US couldn’t really go toe to toe with those countries.

        I’m just not sure if they factored in the rapid technological rise of those adversarial countries like China.

        Or maybe it really is the simplest answer that it was all purely in effort to obtain the greatest profit margins…

    • nickff 23 minutes ago
      The combination of tax policy disincentivizing capital investment, and regulatory policy making physical things hard to do has shifting increasing amounts of investment into finance, software, and services (and away from resource extraction, processing, and manufacturing).
      • mekdoonggi 16 minutes ago
        This is all a function of the dollar as a reserve currency. The US is optimized to be the place to own things. The rest of the world is where people make things.

        Addendum: I think this is bad.

  • leonidasrup 25 minutes ago
    Rare earths are not as rare as the name suggests.

    " The term "rare-earth" is a misnomer, because they are not actually scarce, but because they are found only in compounds, not as pure metals, and are difficult to isolate and purify. REEs are relatively plentiful in the entire Earth's crust (cerium being the 25th-most-abundant element at 68 parts per million, more abundant than copper), but in practice they are spread thinly as trace impurities, so to obtain rare earths at usable purity requires processing enormous amounts of raw ore which is costly and energy intensive. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare-earth_element

    What radioactive element is commonly found with rare earths and has to be separated? Thorium, the same stuff that could power future nuclear reactors and is commonly found on beaches in Kerala, India.

    https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20181016-why-india-wants-...

  • OgsyedIE 1 hour ago
    The price signals drove the move away, it's quite simple. Energy, labor, pollution tolerance, legal costs and economies of scale said to go elsewhere.

    Some said that these price signals only make sense if globalisation lasts forever, but their remarks were dismissed as depressing.

    • bluGill 1 hour ago
      Problem is nobody knows the future. XI didn't come into power until 2012 - until then China was moving slowly in the right direction (that is more open and free), so moves of those things there there seemed to encourage that. However XI has consolidated power and put a break on moving in the right direction and now we need to react.

      I have no idea who will move what way in the future so I can only guess what we will regret in 10 years. However I must act on the world as I know it lest things get worse. (what makes things worse is open for debate)

      • Sha1rholder 34 minutes ago
        >...put a break on moving in the right direction and now we need to react

        - What do you mean "the right direction"? Do you mean the "open and free direction" that "Hey you can't have our Nvidia chips but must keep selling us cheap rare earth"? - And who are "we"? I suggest "we"'d better take care of "ourselves" instead of "react".

        • bluGill 4 minutes ago
          A classical liberal society. Freedom of speech, elections... They were not there, but seemed to be moving that way.
        • windows9 20 minutes ago
          The right direction is accepting Western world domination and not challenging it.
          • OgsyedIE 9 minutes ago
            The above account was created 1 minute before posting the above comment
      • geodel 1 hour ago
        I don't think its Xi's doing vs Globalist looking only for signals which confirmed their views and ignored or outrightly rejected everything contrary.
    • FuckButtons 1 hour ago
      short term profit over long term thinking - because no one in the system is incentivized towards long term thinking. The counter balance should in theory sit within the remit of politics, but even senators can be bought and few are far sighted enough to realize the consequences of incremental deindustrialization.
      • OgsyedIE 26 minutes ago
        Long term thinking is pretty bad too tbh when you dig in at what the different schools of thought imagine about the drivers of politics.

        The electoral constituencies for the antinomianism, authoritarianism and victim-complex revanchism in the West that has prevented friendship between the world powers are all comprised of the same alliance between two groups repeated hundreds of times: moderately impoverished populist masses facing more of the same and industry oligarchs looking to return the west to feudal plantation economies as reprisal for any cultural slights they feel the public has given them.

        The latter group always exists to some extent but the former group only exists because disposable energy (joules, watts, BTU, etc) per capita has been steadily falling since 1973. The golden age of shale exploitation bucked this trend but that has ended too. You can fiddle about with using different financial or interest rates proxies for this if you want but going into joules per person after extraction is the heart of the matter.

        If this decline did not exist, we would not be in the world we're in by a long shot. But if you look at the predictions they're all off. The media, academia, popular culture and business culture expected continuous growth to put fusion power plants on Mars. The UN, IEA, DoE, Long Now people expected moderate growth to sustainable replacement of gas turbines with optimistic greentech buildout figures that use more lithium and copper than can ever be mined. The economic counterculture like NakedCapitalism and The Oil Drum expected Mad Max.

        Nobody predicted the existence of the voter base that brought us the last run of presidents, they predicted different voter bases. Some of the predictors even imagined that the importance of Pennsylvania Avenue would slowly vanish without anybody minding.

  • PowerElectronix 21 minutes ago
    In a grown up world with grown ups ruling countries and acting rationally, this would just be efficiency increase in the markets.

    The US do high qualification job like engineering design, state of the art manufacturing and the such and other countries go to manufacture nuts, bolts and magnets that are mainly low qualification jobs for cheap.

    But, we don't live in that world and the magnet dudes wanna wield the magnets against us and the high quali jobs dudes somehow wanna go back to making nuts and bolts.

    • smallmancontrov 8 minutes ago
      In a grown up world with grown ups ruling countries and acting rationally, we wouldn't have let shareholders sell our Rare Earth processing to the Communist Party of China for a quick buck.

      > the high quali jobs dudes somehow wanna go back to making nuts and bolts

      Nuts and bolts dudes: manufacturing is important because of sovereignty, I wish the market agreed.

      Market: manufacturing is "low quality" because sovereignty is someone else's problem, so why not sell it to the Communists?

      If grown-ups were in charge in the USA, they would have checked the shareholders. But shareholders were in charge, government stood back, and the glorious free market deposited 30 pieces of silver into the pocket of each N shares for their unquestionably wise enlightened self-interest.

    • theteapot 7 minutes ago
      Your so called grown up world sounds like the delusion neo-liberal free market thinking that got the West here in the first place.
    • idiotsecant 10 minutes ago
      its a mistake to think that the US will have any kind of monopoly on 'high qualification' jobs when the social convection engine that labor powered is dead. We are becoming a nation of finance bros, vibe coders, and a growing and permeant underclass of just about everyone else. The rest of the world has caught up after the postwar era and if we want to compete, we need to cut out the cancer that is systemic massive wealth disparity.

      A healthy society finds roles for all it's citizens, not just the ones with the right credentials.

  • throw0101c 57 minutes ago
    See also National Helium Reserve, which was also sold:

    * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Helium_Reserve

    It became a bit of a news item a few months ago:

    > Ripple effects from the war in Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz continue to widen. There's yet another brewing shortage, this time in helium. While most people associate helium with balloons and funny voices, the element is used in a surprisingly wide variety of industrial settings, including semiconductor production, where its role in advanced lithography has been growing rapidly. But helium mining and exploration in North America has been practically non-existent for a variety of reasons. And while the US used to have a strategic helium reserve, the government started selling that down in the late 1990s. On this episode, we speak with Nicholas Snyder, the founder and CEO of North American Helium, which does helium mining in Canada. We discuss the properties of helium that make it so useful, as well as the difficulties of expanding global production and distribution.

    * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjc6MgUY0BE

    * https://omny.fm/shows/odd-lots/now-theres-a-helium-shortage-...

    * https://podcasts.apple.com/pe/podcast/now-theres-a-helium-sh...

  • tehjoker 59 minutes ago
    It's pretty funny the lengths these guys will go to avoid nationalization, though to be honest, China is basically in the right here. USA is being aggressive, China is responding. The authors are resentful that America can't do anything it wants without pushback.
    • merely-unlikely 27 minutes ago
      Does that logic apply to Europe too?

      EU Set to Lift Sanction on Chinese Firm to Save ASML Supplier[1]

      > In exchange, the EU would remove trade restrictions it put on an unnamed Chinese firm accused of aiding Russia’s war against Ukraine.

      > Sindlhauser, which relies on Chinese rare earths and critical minerals supplies, is at risk of going out of business in the coming months if China’s sanctions stay in place, according to the people. Targeting an otherwise obscure firm illustrates the lengths China is going to gain detailed knowledge into Europe’s economic pinch points.

      > People familiar with the case say Sindlhauser is almost exclusively reliant on Chinese rare earths, and the listing caused a supply chain shock for the company that had until now done little work to diversify or minimize its dependence on the Chinese inputs.

      [1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-10-14/eu-set-to...

      • OgsyedIE 11 minutes ago
        Don't take the assumption of Chinese knowledge of pinch points that seriously. ASML is the end user of a production chain spanning 9,000+ companies, it's amazing it hasn't broken from just jet fuel prices.
      • windows9 2 minutes ago
        China is lawful evil. They behave logically. Dutch government can't handle leaders like Trump or Putin. Or when Netanyahu starts ranting about muh Jewish ancestors. We're trying ro run a planet here.