3 comments

  • Aeolun 25 minutes ago
    Surely, knowing what the requirements are, we can build a cheaper Tomahawk missile these days, right?

    SpaceX does the whole rocket launch thing for a fraction of the cost of the space shuttle. GPS is not that complicated any more and all the processing power required fits in a chip the size of a cellphone.

    But those things cost 2.5M a piece?

    • memoriesofsmell 15 minutes ago
      It's not just the cost of a GPS chip, it's the custom turbofan engine, the other guidance system components, active radar (in some units) and a guarantee that you can keep the unit in a tube for years and ensure that it's gonna work when you need it.

      Plus low volume production volums and long times needed to manufacture it.

      Could it be cheaper? Yeah I'm sure. But the US Gov is willing to pay for em so why drop the price?

    • dylan604 9 minutes ago
      Would building something reliant on GPS be the right way to go? We've seen how easy it is to make it not very reliable. Musk has also shown that StarLink/Shield reliability are at the mercy of how he feels that day. Internal navigation still seems the most reliable for Tomahawks
    • trial3 15 minutes ago
      i am not a medical professional, but i urge you to get checked out for Engineer’s Disease
  • doctorpangloss 13 minutes ago
    i don't know. the DoD is planning for the wrong wars. the bloodiest war in the US was the civil war.
  • jocelyner 22 minutes ago
    [flagged]