8 in 10 Americans oppose live-streaming execution

(washingtonpost.com)

27 points | by geox 52 minutes ago

10 comments

  • snapcaster 23 minutes ago
    I go back and forth on this. I'm generally opposed, but I also think that if we have a death penalty it shouldn't be so bloodless. It should be a beheading that the governor of the state has to do themselves. We shouldn't be able to pretend we aren't doing something incredibly violent
    • alphawhisky 3 minutes ago
      I wonder how people would weigh in on the death penalty if the executioner got selected from the criminal's peers akin to a jury.
  • HumblyTossed 16 minutes ago
    I wouldn't want to watch it. I think we should abolish the death penalty. Make people live the rest of their lives with their mistakes.
  • satisfice 1 minute ago
    I support the death penalty for people I personally want to kill, which is why the death penalty is probably a bad idea.
  • satisfice 4 minutes ago
    The other two in ten are not scheduled for execution.
  • chasd00 26 minutes ago
    heh we're seriously considering live-streaming someone's execution but live-streaming a woman taking off her shirt to the public would be an outrage. I lean toward "America f*ck yeah!" but I know there's plenty of stupid here as well.
  • spacedcowboy 41 minutes ago
    Who are the fucking ghouls that want to see someone executed live ? 20% of the population ? Jesus fucking tap-dancing christ almighty.
    • worldsavior 23 minutes ago
      20% is a lot. All the families that were hurt by a terrorist attack, or even some attack, can have some relief by revenge. It makes sense.
      • master-lincoln 19 minutes ago
        Seems unlikely to me that 20% of the population were connected to a terrorist attack by someone who would be executed.

        Even if, I don't see how seeing one of the perpetrators getting killed many years later would give relief.

        I also believe eternal prison is a bigger punishment than execution.

    • octopoc 37 minutes ago
      It's not necessarily just about wanting to see someone executed. Which is worse:

      - Executing people in a way that makes us not have to think about it as a society, or only think about it in passing

      - Executing people in our faces, so we have to think about it

      Personally I find the first option gross. "Out of sight, out of mind"--you know what I mean?

      • gazook89 32 minutes ago
        I agree. I don’t want to watch it, I’d rather have no death penalty, but if the government for and by the people is okay with killing citizens then perhaps we should be facing that, not turning our backs.

        Perhaps we could then rally behind getting rid of death penalty. Or at the very least, ensure we aren’t botching every other one.

      • NekkoDroid 28 minutes ago
        Well, the sanest option is to not have the death penalty at all. Anything else is trying to make the problem work.
        • philipallstar 25 minutes ago
          The sanest option is not to commit capital crimes.
          • mcphage 6 minutes ago
            The sanest option is not to have capital crimes, that way nobody can commit them.
          • Leonard_of_Q 16 minutes ago
            You were downvoted but you're right, live by the sword and take the risk to die by it. If you don't like the odds - and let's all hope the judicial system is efficient enough to make those odds really unfavourable - it is easy to avoid them by not committing capital crimes.
            • philipallstar 12 minutes ago
              Thanks. Commenting the same logic but on the individual is definitely a downvote risk! Why have normal expectations of people when you can have extraordinary expectations of the state, and want other people to pay for it?
      • ungovernableCat 18 minutes ago
        Making it public will invite the deviants who derive pleasure from the audience. Look up historical behaviours of crowds in some of the last public executions in France.

        If this were livestreamed you'd have just insanely grotesque stuff like livestream commentators narrating and reacting to the footage while polymarket ads play over it, making memes and remixes of it like what happened with the Charlie Kirk assassination clips. It's all sick IMO.

      • bmelton 19 minutes ago
        Palmer Luckey had an ... interesting perspective on it. I was against it before, and I'm still against it, but his point was that the killing of a citizen is one of the largest possible flexes that a state can exercise, and to prevent against its abuse it should probably be more visible to more people

        I think that there is likely _enough_ visibility in the case of the classic execution, which is only done after the fifth amendment has been thoroughly exercised and appeals process fully depleted, and (ironically) not nearly enough visibility in the exercise of state power done by drone strikes and such, and so I take his point and appreciate it for what it is, which predominately is that I hadn't thought about it in that way before -- I still oppose the idea, but perhaps less strongly than before now that I know that bloodlust isn't the only viable interest (tho still a tremendous worry to me)

      • etchalon 26 minutes ago
        Except the execution wasn't being presented as a somber recognition of the brutalism of the death penalty, but a celebration of vengeance.
      • sprann23 34 minutes ago
        [dead]
    • classified 33 minutes ago
      Everyone who is for the death penalty should be legally obligated to watch every single execution.
      • zulux 0 minutes ago
        If we do this, Abortion proponenets are going to have a lot of watching to do.
      • gruez 23 minutes ago
        1. Practically speaking, what's the intended effect, given that executions nowadays are pretty sanitized anyways? Lethal injection is basically equivalent to some guy going under anesthesia.

        2. Do you actually believe in the implied principle of "if you support [x] you must watch every [x]", or are you just using it a cudgel against people you hate? Would it be fair game for anti-abortion groups to demand "if you support abortion you must watch every abortion"?

      • educar 25 minutes ago
        While we are at it, Can we have all non-vegetarians watch all the slaughter houses?
    • j4kp07 34 minutes ago
      [dead]
    • nailer 14 minutes ago
      I'd like to see the rape gangs in the UK executed. I thin it would deter the next group of rape gangs.
      • ragebol 10 minutes ago
        If the death penalty deterred anyone, there only would have been a single death penalty ever (or only one for every sort of crime).
        • nailer 6 minutes ago
          In this case, organized rape was effectively unpoliced for some time to avoid "community tensions" with police saying the children involved "were slags". The message should be sent that organized crime will now be prosecuted.
  • ReptileMan 25 minutes ago
    Who wouldn't be opposed. It is boring. Make it guillotine with a slide and bowling pins at the end. And take bets on Polymarket whether there will be split or no - then the numbers will be reversed.

    We are moving anyway towards Escape from NY/LA world. Let's at least take the good parts from it.

  • lenerdenator 34 minutes ago
    Didn't Trump cancel the live streaming of the military execution?

    I'd rather we got rid of the death penalty pretty much everywhere but the military, but I don't see how watching an execution really benefits anyone. Watching another human getting shot isn't going to benefit your soul or whatever you want to call it.

    • 10111001 25 minutes ago
      The OP article is dated October 15, 2026, it also says:

      > The poll was conducted online Oct. 9-13 among 2,545 U.S. adults nationwide reached through the Ipsos KnowledgePanel

      Apparently Trump called off the livestream on October 15: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crx23qlnj27qo.

      So this article is last week's news.

  • theturtle 1 minute ago
    [dead]