11 comments

  • accrual 20 minutes ago
    "might" === "absolutely will", just for the record.
    • javcasas 16 minutes ago
      No. You mean "we are already using, but before you notice..."
  • adamtaylor_13 1 minute ago
    You've gotta be able to actually show me ads before you can target me with ads.
  • mandeepj 5 minutes ago
    Gmail has already been targeted from day 1!
  • sippingabonedry 1 minute ago
    Friendly reminder when you click a link in a Gmail message, Google's servers also make a separate HTTP request for that link.

    For your safety I'm sure.

  • jsemrau 9 minutes ago
    The enshitification of Google is inevitable. It went from all the space you ever need for your email to "you are at 93% usage. Upgrade to premium" in just a few years.
  • gregglain 1 minute ago
    "might"
  • varispeed 18 minutes ago
    Well, if we didn't have corrupt regulators, Google would have been fined out of existence ages ago.

    That said it will be interesting way of exploitation. If you want to find people who have certain email content, you can serve them ads manipulating them into taking an action. Like buying a scam product / malware.

  • ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago
  • krunck 1 hour ago
    I dumped Google years ago because I saw this, among other enshitification, was inevitable. Never looked back. Life is good.
    • Muhammad523 31 minutes ago
      I also dumped google long time ago, i was around 12
    • noncoml 36 minutes ago
      What do you use for email?
      • black_knight 4 minutes ago
        Buy a domain, then you don’t lose your domain if you ever decide to jump to a different provider. I use fastmail currently. But I also keep my own backups.
      • throwaway81523 28 minutes ago
        It's basically impossible to not use gmail. Even if you don't have a gmail account or address yourself, the person you're emailing probably has it, so your messages gets sent to a gmail server and gets scanned by them. What I want to know is whether Google uses the contents to profile YOU.
        • wahern 20 minutes ago
          GMail has a 25-30% share of the client market.

          Is it impractical to never send a message through Google? Probably, depending on the circles you communicate in. But that's not the same thing as saying it's impractical to avoid Google for most of your messages, and certainly not the same as saying you can't avoid GMail for anything.

          • warkdarrior 17 minutes ago
            My main email is not GMail, but I forward it to a GMail account to get free spam filtering, free backup, and free search. I encourage everyone to do the same.
            • adiM 11 minutes ago
              How does that help in preventing Google from profiling you?
            • frizlab 6 minutes ago
              That’s, to put it plainly, dumb.
      • xigoi 10 minutes ago
        Purelymail. Really cheap, just works and doesn’t get in my way.

        https://purelymail.com/

      • frizlab 5 minutes ago
        Fastmail. They are good.
      • heikkilevanto 34 minutes ago
        ProtonMail, FastMail, self-hosted...
        • Rebelgecko 15 minutes ago
          Why not standardize on a single solution instead of maintaining your own stack AND paying for someone else to do the work?
        • platevoltage 10 minutes ago
          If I could use ProtonMail with my mail client without a weird bridge application, I would have switched a long time ago.
      • mportela 34 minutes ago
        I'm using Proton. Never had an issue with them.
        • noncoml 29 minutes ago
          Do you emails land on the inbox when the recipient is on gmail? Or do they go to spam?
      • bamboozled 23 minutes ago
        I just pay for it like any other service.
      • cowlevel 33 minutes ago
        Tuta
  • cowlevel 33 minutes ago
    Google's always done this, it's the entire reason Gmail exists. Now they're just saying it.
    • ViktorRay 29 minutes ago
      This isn’t true and this level of cynicism is really unhelpful.

      They originally used Gmail in that way. Many years later they stopped. This was a major victory for privacy. The fact they seem to be doing it now again is bad. Saying they’ve “always done this” is the kind of empty conspiratorial cynicism that dampens action and makes people feel it is futile to notice these changes or speak up about them.

      • slyrus 21 minutes ago
        The fact that they did it in the beginning and are doing it now makes the whole “well, there was a period of time when they didn’t do this” seem like a minor footnote to the notion that “they’ve always done this”. Even though the statement isn’t strictly true, it sure seems like the cynicism is warranted now and, with the benefit of hindsight, was back then too.
        • warkdarrior 19 minutes ago
          Giving up (aka cynicism) is easy.
      • cowlevel 19 minutes ago
        What's the evidence they stopped?