At least on gemini generated images vs real ones, it works surprisingly well.
Taking a photo of an AI generated image on my grubby laptop screen with my phone, moire and all, still got detected. So the signal it's using is pretty robust.
People often shit on AI detectors but Pangram's text AI detection has been very good, IME. Not perfect, but good enough to be useful in most circumstances.
I'm very skeptical of AI detection and watermarking for text (especially short passages), but AI detection for images and videos seems much more plausible (for now at least).
I would love if Meta licensed this tech to use for everything on Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp. Including ads!
Taking a photo of an AI generated image on my grubby laptop screen with my phone, moire and all, still got detected. So the signal it's using is pretty robust.
1. Social media moderation. You want to limit the proliferation of this stuff because it annoys users.
2. Trades where authenticity matters, like journalism, law, education. You have to weed out the crap and people will try to deceive you.
I would love if Meta licensed this tech to use for everything on Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp. Including ads!
Do you believe it generally doesn't work or do you believe that if you work at it you can evade them and therefore there's no point to it?