Process Explorer for macOS

(github.com)

53 points | by ingve 21 hours ago

14 comments

  • jollyllama 42 minutes ago
    How's it compare to Objective See's TaskExplorer? [0]

    [0] https://objective-see.org/products/taskexplorer.html

  • kristiandupont 16 minutes ago
    This feels like a decent place to plug one of my vibe-coded side projects Mac Monitor: https://kristiandupont.github.io/mac-monitor/

    I made this mostly because I wanted something to signal to me that the CPU is running wild. With no fan, I often discover this a bit late, so I wanted just a very subtle indicator in the menu bar. I also added a UI in the browser which shows you some details, though nothing near the level of Process Explorer.

  • jherskovic 1 hour ago
    Installed it. Pretty straight port UI-wise, it seems like it would be very useful. It doesn’t look ‘Mac’ at all, but for developer tooling that gets a pass from me.

    I couldn’t see details for some processes, which was reasonable since I wasn’t running as root. I installed the privileged helper that came with the process… and now the process tree is empty.

    Maybe it needs a little more time in the oven?

  • kburman 1 hour ago
    I've been working on something similar for Linux, in Rust with egui. It reads from /proc, cgroups, systemd over D-Bus and the netlink proc connector, so it also catches processes that start and exit between refreshes. It runs without root, and anything it can't read just shows "—".

    Check screenshot here - https://postimg.cc/gallery/CMczmdh/ceda7197

  • mannycalavera42 32 minutes ago
    - sort by CPU seems not working - clicking on the Processes column is not switching between tree view and flatview
  • Topfi 42 minutes ago
    Might actually start using that, had a few processes on macOS 27 get into infinite loops and causing massive load, especially Safari PIDs. Being able to kill full trees, see children and look at the resources taken, might be useful. Shame that Activity Monitor is so bare in features and even takes a surprising amount of time to load.

    On a related note, macOS 27 is an extremely buggy, unpredictable mess and you should feel annoyed when using it. Amazing how they can have such great hardware, ham strung by poor software QA and doubly so since this has been an issue on every Mac I have ever used going back to 2009. macOS occasionally gets a bug squashing pass, but just as fast as we get a Snow Leopard, an unstable Lion follows. Also, hotspot and WiFi generally are still utterly unreliable.

  • vondur 1 hour ago
    This looks like a port of the process explorer from the Sysinternals suite of tools that people like under windows. I think I also saw something similar to this from Dave Plummer ex Microsoft Dev. at tmog.org.
    • zamadatix 9 minutes ago
      Seems like a safe bet that's what it is since "Sysinternals Process Explorer for Mac" is the opening title of the README :D.

      Certain things like Sysinternals tools outside of their native platforms is somethnig I hope to see more of. E.g. I had a SumatraPDF and 7z GUI clone on Linux for a while just because I liked it more than the Linux PDF readers (now I have a home grown app which handles more formats). It looks like this one could use a bit more time in the oven though.

  • overallduka 1 hour ago
    Microsoft not happy in being ugly itself, now exports ugliness to Mac OS.
    • panzagl 11 minutes ago
      If you ever used the abomination that was iTunes for Windows, you would say this is retaliation that is long overdue.
  • hparadiz 13 minutes ago
    Been working on this for Linux for the past 10 months. Inspired by procexp but better. I even have it working remotely over an SSH socket.

    https://evemon.technex.us/

    https://github.com/hparadiz/evemon

  • WhereIsTheTruth 1 hour ago
    This is the first time i witness a ugly mac app
    • dinkblam 1 hour ago
      how was it even possible to get such an ugly toolbar with Swift?
      • Scharkenberg 46 minutes ago
        It's obviously a straight port without much UI/UX optimization at the moment. I'm still fascinated that the port was possible at all.

        The more important question is: Does it work well yet?

        • llimllib 43 minutes ago
          > Does it work well yet?

          no, definitely not

      • Cockbrand 1 hour ago
        I have to admit that I was intrigued at first... until I saw the UI. Too bad, but maybe they'll find more Mac-like icons at some point.
  • etchalon 1 hour ago
    Man, Microsoft just has no idea how to make decent UIs, huh
  • tonymet 36 minutes ago
    Process Explorer offers 1000x the observability , including sockets, file handles, libs, syscalls , threads, cpu state -- nearly every resource in use. It's a tremendous tool .

    Don't overlook it just because of your backwards bias against the vendor. It wasn't originally developed by MS anyway -- Sysinternals were consultants that got acquired by MS.

    Something you should aspire to.

  • rekabis 16 hours ago
    This looks to be still in deep alpha.

    It initially listed a lot of processes, but failed to display anything in the three main columns (CPU, footprint, memory), and nothing at all in the details at the bottom.

    Then, when the privileged helper was installed and approved through Login Items, nothing came up ever again. All panels of the window are now blank, even after a full restart of the app.

    Edit: I did not build from source, I used the downloabable DMG from the release assets.

  • java-man 1 hour ago
    Probably phones the mothership every minute and continuously requests an update. /s